Discussion:
[OAUTH-WG] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on
Alexey Melnikov
2017-07-21 11:08:13 UTC
Permalink
Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS point.

New nit: URN needs a reference to RFC 8141.
Nat Sakimura
2017-07-21 12:57:07 UTC
Permalink
Thanks Alexey, and sorry for taking this long.

I will fix the nits about URN ASAP.

Best,

Nat

--
このメールは、本来の宛先の方のみに限定された機密情報が含まれてい
る場合がございます。お心あたりのない場合は、送信者にご連絡のうえ、
このメールを削除して下さいますようお願い申し上げます。
PLEASE READ :This e-mail is confidential and intended for the
named recipient only. If you are not an intended recipient,
please notify the sender and delete this e-mail.
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:08 PM
Subject: Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-14: (with
COMMENT)
Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS point.
New nit: URN needs a reference to RFC 8141.
Loading...