Hannes Tschofenig
2016-03-10 10:21:30 UTC
Hi all,
we would like to conclude this call for adoption.
Based on the feedback we would believe that this document should become
a working group document and thereby a starting point for further work.
We do, however, take the feedback from Mike Schwartz serious. He raises
a good point regarding the reliability of the conveyed values when
different algorithms, and different processes are used by those making
the assertions. This needs to be addressed as part of operational
considerations in a future version of the document.
We also believe that the introduction needs to be extended to explain
the envisioned use case/scenarios (or call them architecture) for those
who had not been involved in this work from the beginning.
Ciao
Hannes & Derek
we would like to conclude this call for adoption.
Based on the feedback we would believe that this document should become
a working group document and thereby a starting point for further work.
We do, however, take the feedback from Mike Schwartz serious. He raises
a good point regarding the reliability of the conveyed values when
different algorithms, and different processes are used by those making
the assertions. This needs to be addressed as part of operational
considerations in a future version of the document.
We also believe that the introduction needs to be extended to explain
the envisioned use case/scenarios (or call them architecture) for those
who had not been involved in this work from the beginning.
Ciao
Hannes & Derek
In response to my message to the list regarding the initial call for
adoption of the Authentication Method Reference Values draft, see
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15694.html, Mike
submitted an updated version of the document to take raised concerns
into account. Several working group participants responded positively to
the new version.
We would therefore like to issue a 2nd call for adoption of the recently
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-05
Please let us know by March 3rd whether you accept / object to the
adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth
working group.
Ciao
Hannes & Derek
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
adoption of the Authentication Method Reference Values draft, see
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15694.html, Mike
submitted an updated version of the document to take raised concerns
into account. Several working group participants responded positively to
the new version.
We would therefore like to issue a 2nd call for adoption of the recently
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-05
Please let us know by March 3rd whether you accept / object to the
adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth
working group.
Ciao
Hannes & Derek
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth