Joel Halpern
2017-01-24 18:13:19 UTC
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Not Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-??
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2017-01-24
IETF LC End Date: None
IESG Telechat date: 2017-02-02
Summary: This document is not ready for publication as a standards
track RFC.
[Reviewers note: It is quite possible that the problem listed below
is my error. In that case, this should be considered as ready with
minor issues.]
Major issues:
I can not find any record of an IETF last call for this document.
I looked in the document history and the IETF discussion list. If I
missed it, I apologize for being oblivious.
Minor issues:
Why is the example if section 4 (and others later on) described as
"non-normative"? Is it incomplete? incorrect? An example is, by
definition, not a full specification. The language seems designed to
reduce the value of the example. I would recommend removing all the
"non-normative" notes from the examples. They are clearly stated to
be examples.
Nits/editorial comments:
Review result: Not Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-??
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2017-01-24
IETF LC End Date: None
IESG Telechat date: 2017-02-02
Summary: This document is not ready for publication as a standards
track RFC.
[Reviewers note: It is quite possible that the problem listed below
is my error. In that case, this should be considered as ready with
minor issues.]
Major issues:
I can not find any record of an IETF last call for this document.
I looked in the document history and the IETF discussion list. If I
missed it, I apologize for being oblivious.
Minor issues:
Why is the example if section 4 (and others later on) described as
"non-normative"? Is it incomplete? incorrect? An example is, by
definition, not a full specification. The language seems designed to
reduce the value of the example. I would recommend removing all the
"non-normative" notes from the examples. They are clearly stated to
be examples.
Nits/editorial comments: